please be aware that i will begin grading this assignment by 30 June.
Leaders please ensure that your group is on the right track.
Rubrics for Assessment will be based on this:
Below Expectations (0-7)
Shows no attempt at understanding task given.
Little or no reference to text when posting or using specific evidence from text to support.
Merely copying or paraphrasing text.
No attempt to discuss issues/ideas encountered when reading text.
No evidence of thinking about certain issues raised in text and seem NOT to have engaged with the text at all.
Limited to surface or literal questions with information lifted from text but rarely question interpretations offered by other members.
ONLY 1-2 members are dominating group, other members do not show understanding of task/role or do not attempt to ask or seek help from others.
Meeting Expectations (8-11)
There is an adequate attempt at demonstrating understanding of task and text.
There is attempt at linking observations/ideas/discussions to text and giving and explaining how specific evidence from text can be used to support discussion.
Some evidence of thinking shown though often do NOT read beyond the surface bt some attempt shown to critically question other’s point of view and interpretations
Understanding shown is usually limited to paraphrasing from text instead of engaging in questioning text or seeing connections or links between different characters/themes/incidents
Some attempt to use creative WEB tools to demonstrate understanding though not always used appropriately and may not succeed in enhancing explanation or understanding
Most members are actively involved in task through asking questions and raising issues for discussion. But, there is inadequate follow-up on issues/ideas raised.
Above Expectations (12-15)
A good understanding of task and text shown with interesting questions raised and ongoing discussion of certain topics/issues by different members.
There is appropriate use of reference to text as evidence where references are explained linking it themes, character analysis and issues are raised for further discussion
Clear evidence of thinking shown though reading beyond the surface, raising interesting questions and issues for discussion nd critically questioning other’s point of vew and interpretations
Good understanding shown by engaging in active questioning of text or good attempt to see connections or links between different characters/themes/incidents
Good attempt to use creative WEB tools to demonstrate understanding mostly used appropriately and sucesfully in enhancing explanation or understanding
ALL members are participating group, asking questions, explaining to each other, follow up on other members work and working as a group effectively.
